When was fright night filmed

Crazy credits During the opening credits, the F and T in Fright Night elongate into a pair of fangs. Alternate versions The Swedish version cinema and video misses the following: The transformation scene with Ed was removed 1m 50sec , and the scene where Dandrige's assistant melts was shortened by 16 sec. Connections Edited into Fright Night Part 2 A division of Capitol Records, Inc. User reviews Review. Top review.

But when I saw it to the end, I was almost totally converted. Although the beginning is a bit cheesy and reminiscent of stereotypical horror B-movies, it soon becomes clear that this is part of what makes Fright Night so original.

All the typical horror film genres are there: horror, romance, comedy well maybe comedy isn't a typical horror element ; but what makes this horror flick stand out a mile-and-a-half from the rest is that it's a very offbeat tale. It's creepily cheesy but gets away with it because it's atmosphere is so good.

All this and I haven't mentioned the acting or special effects yet. Sarandon seems to give such an effortless performance as the vampire and as a result is almost perfect. I had thought of what a modern day vampire would be like before I saw Fright Night; but Jerry Dandridge just blew all these ideas away and has to be the coolest and I don't often use that word and sexiest vampire ever, and is one of my favourite movie villains.

Roddy McDowall can't hold a candle to Sarandon but is still very good, and Stephen Geoffreys is one of the funniest and memorable movie characters ever to grace a film screen too. The special effects are good for and unlike where in modern films the SFX are the main point in the movie, here they add to the already present chilling atmosphere.

And although on the one hand, Fright Night is quite dated, it also captures the atmosphere and the essence of the 80s. The soundtrack is excellent for the film, but paradoxically not very memorable apart from one or two good songs. FAQ 6. What is 'Fright Night' about? Is 'Fright Night' based on a book? Does Evil Ed turn into a werewolf after being bitten by Jerry Dandridge? Details Edit. Release date August 2, United States. United States. Welcome to Fright Night It has occurred to me that when people refer to a new "reimagining" of a beloved film, they use the term "unnecessary remake.

I really tend to think, however, that technically any remake is unnecessary. No one "needs" to be told what is basically the same story in most cases twice. I've also heard the argument that bad films are the ones that should be remade, not good ones.

I can understand that to an extent, but do people really want to sit through a new version of something they hated the first time? No remake is going to make everyone happy; it's just not possible. Unless of course, you haven't SEEN the original. So, just how should a remake be judged?

As a stand-alone film, or how it compares to a previous one we love so much? It is just the right mix of comedy, terror, suspense, terrific performances, and an affection for old-fashioned scares. Many others have fond memories of it as well, so I relate to the "why"s and the "oh don't screw it up"s, and the "leave it alone"s.

After all, beloved films are dumped on all the time by would-be filmmakers out to make a quick buck for the safe Hollywood studios. Most of the central story is intact: Anton Yelchin leads the cast as Charley Brewster, a used-to-be high-school misfit who comes to the realization, thanks to childhood buddy Ed Christopher Mintz-Plasse that his new neighbor Jerry Colin Farrell is a vampire.

It isn't long before he's convinced his single mother Toni Collette and his girlfriend Imogen Poots of this discovery Screenwriter Marti Noxon has infused a basic story whose plot points and situations weren't always very believable with some new smarts, including adding more depth to the central characters. And the setting has changed to a cookie-cutter suburb of Las Vegas, where people sleep during the day, work at night, and are much more transient. Another interesting change is the character of Peter Vincent.

Here, David Tennant assumes the role, but Vincent has become an elaborate Vegas magician who performs vampire-killing antics on the stage. In both versions, they are recruited by our hero to help slay the bloodsucker. It's an ultra- modern twist, but within the location context, works beautifully. During the first hour or so of 's new incarnation, I was shocked to think that I may end up liking this remake even more than the original.

But after some hair-raising moments in the first half, culminating in a dark, desert car chase, the film threatens to go off the rails in a sequence that's a bit hokey, over the top, and unfortunately timed. And there are a few iffy CGI instances as well. Luckily, things get back on track with a climax that's executed with a uniquely creepy wit, and a few good shocks and surprises.

Most of the performances are engaging and authentic aside from Mintz-Plasse in his later moments , with Tennant's wry turn a real treat, and the ever-wonderful Collette's naturally grounding presence adding a needed weight of normalcy. It is Farrell, however, who is the real deal; he absolutely nails this role no, he won't make you forget the original's suave Chris Sarandon, but in fairness, Jerry is written much differently in this update. Farrell combines sexiness and utter menace to the fullest: this vamp means business!

Some of the best work of his admittedly spotty career is on display, including the film's most brilliant moment, where Jerry's fidgety impatience with being invited into the Brewster home is both hilarious and nerve-wracking.

FAQ 7. What is 'Fright Night' about? Is 'Fright Night' based on a book? Is Chris Sarandon really in this movie? Details Edit. Culver City, Ca. Club Radio interior - W. Email This BlogThis! Anonymous December 23, at PM. Anonymous January 10, at AM.

Unknown September 29, at PM. Anonymous February 12, at PM. Anonymous August 30, at PM. Anonymous September 19, at PM. Unknown August 7, at AM.