Jose can you see huntington

Traditionally, most people do not agree on the content of anthologies — whether they are literature, film, music or something else — because the selection of contributions is so selective.

The perpetual cause of contention for an editor is that someone always feels slighted and left out. But of even more concern are not the fragile egos of academics, but the actual utility of the anthology itself, which arguably, was written to benefit a certain population to ameliorate their knowledge. The key then is to put together a collection of writing that is as comprehensive as possible and representative of many voices so that every vantage point and perspective can be edited and arranged in a cogent way that it informs and engenders debate.

According to Kramnick and Lowi:. But the two are rarely in true competition, let alone dialectical tension. The United States ignores this challenge at its peril In this new era, the single most immediate and most serious challenge to America's traditional identity comes from the immense and continuing immigration from Latin America, especially from Mexico, and the fertility rates of these immigrants compared to black and white American natives. As intended, the splashy publication of the advance of that book in Foreign Policy has set off a national debate, as people take sides as to whether this racist drivel is true, false, or perhaps, as one "professor" has already written, part-true, and therefore to be entertained as a matter of discussion.

The real question is, what is Huntington up to? Or rather: What are the interests behind him up to? As anyone half-serious who has suffered through reading any of his works knows, Huntington is no independent intellect, but has always functioned as a hired hand for the financier interests who find his cultivated hatred of humanity useful to their cause. Read Huntington's latest article, therefore, as a signal piece, a declaration of intent by the interests who deploy him, in the light of LaRouche's warning.

Huntington's "thesis" is premised on the bald historical lie that the United States was founded by settlers who were "overwhelmingly white, British, and Protestant," and that its culture is a product "of the distinct Anglo-Protestant culture," "English concepts of the rule of law," and the English language most emphatically. He asserts that there are "irreconciliable differences" between this "Anglo-Protestant culture" and Hispanic culture, shaped as it was by Catholicism.

In this, Huntington is in full agreement with the synarchists involved in reviving the new fascist international of which LaRouche warned in his Aug. They share a common outlook, and accept a common lie about what the United States is, who built it, and for what mission. If Middle Eastern Americans are white by law, then why are they treated like second-class citizens?

Notably, the argument of second-class citizen status can be taken out of the racial context, e. The constant waffling and inability for the federal judiciary to create a clear precedent on the issue of whiteness dots much of the opinions in some of the classic cases from this period, such as United States v.

Balsara , Ex parte Dow , Ozawa v. United States and United States v. Thind Tehranian highlights two particular cases — In re Hassan and Ex parte Mohriez — as an example of the judicial confusion of the time. In the former, a federal judge in Michigan ruled that an Arab male was not white for purposes of naturalization because of religion and assimilation. Astonishingly, two years later, another federal judge, this time in Massachusetts, held that an Arab male was white because of the cultural and scientific achievements of the community in history, such as the invention of algebra and the architecture of Spain.

But when Congress ended the system of race-based naturalization in and then the national original quota system in , the battle for Middle Eastern American identity seemed to jump from the court room to the stage, as this particular American community struggled to maintain its identity in television, film and music. You can speak Spanish at home and watch novelas on Univision, and be in fluent in English and very successful at work. Coatsworth wrote in an e-mail to The Crimson.

Issues of American National Identity. Hernandez, who immigrated from Mexico at age 13, says she and three other Hispanic students in the class met with Huntington at the Faculty Club in December to discuss their concerns. It seemed like you were talking to the wall.

Putnam offers a starkly contrasting portrait of his longtime colleague. Three years later, the Weather Underground, a militant group opposed to American involvement in Vietnam, bombed the Harvard Center for International Affairs, where Huntington still works.