How is john different from the other gospels

It was rejected as heretical by many individuals and groups within the early Christian movement. It was used extensively by the Gnostic Christians. But it was ultimately accepted into the official canon, over many objections.

It is now the favorite gospel of many conservative Christians, and the gospel least referred to by many liberal Christians. The table below highlights the differences between the synoptic gospels and John. While many of the entries in the table are merely reporting on different aspects of the life of Jesus, a few of them represent critical differences in the fact of an event central to Christian theology. These events are highlighted in red.

In fact, as highlighted below, there are multiple versions of foundational stories. How is it possible for the inerrant, infallible word of God to have two different values for the same event when there is only one possible value? The events listed below have definite answers.

There is no room for interpretation. There can be only one true answer, yet the Bible gives two or more; hence at least one answer is wrong, false. If the Bible is in error on these most crucial, foundational precepts, how can we trust anything the bible says? These contradictions in the foundational events prove that the bible is errant. Many of the errors creation, Noah, Moses, Exodus, Jesus Divinity, etc have been addressed in our doctrine.

For an even more complete comparison of the discrepancies in Mark, Matthew, Luke and John, see this Wikipedia article.

Did any of you stop to think that maybe each author was trying to teach something and therefore organized different already written scrips in different ways.

I think you are on the right track with John being false doctrine that was put into the cannozized text. Manna is mushrooms. The Earth is NOT spinning faster than the speed of sound around an imaginary axis. Flagellum Cell proves Darwin wrong. Have you considered the possibility that God does not reveal all of his thoughts and motives to man, and that he fulfils his promises in His own time, not when we want? Science has recently proved that the bright star followed by the wise men occured from the converging of two stars about years ago.

No surprise you believe that nonsense, you have built up a nearly impenetrable fortress of ignorance in your mind that keeps out all rational and critical thought. You are commenting using your WordPress. You are commenting using your Google account.

You are commenting using your Twitter account. You are commenting using your Facebook account. Notify me of new comments via email. Kingdom of God is a background theme. Similar to beliefs taught by Hillel. Largely independent of Judaism and in opposition to much of its teaching. One or more additional women None; Mary Magdalene went alone Who was present in the tomb? That fact has been recognized since the early church itself.

The last supper is actually eaten before the beginning of passover. How is the Gospel of John different from the Synoptics? Scholars since the 19th century have regarded Mark as the first of the gospels called the theory of Markan priority. Markan priority led to the belief that Mark must be the most reliable of the gospels, but today there is a large consensus that the author of Mark was not intending to write history.

What is the primary difference between the synoptic Gospels and the Gospel of John? Since the s the first three books of the New Testament have been called the Synoptic Gospels because they are so similar in structure, content, and wording that they can easily be set side by side to provide a synoptic comparison of their content.

Synoptic means having the same view, and if you read the gospels of Matthew, Mark, and Luke you will understand why they are considered the synoptic gospels. Preaching style. Brief one-liners; parables. Essay format. Jesus teaches as:. A sage. A philosopher and mystic. A main function of his ministry. None performed. True parables. Theme of his teaching:. Kingdom of God. Jesus himself. Jesus' theology. Deviated little from 1st century CE liberal Judaism.

Response expected from the reader Respond to God's will as expressed in the Mosaic law. Respond to Jesus as the definitive expression of God's will or revelation. Exorcism of demons. Involvement with the poor and suffering. Focus of his ministry. Rarely mentioned. Involvement with Scribes Jewish teachers. No references at all. Miracles performed by Jesus. Many "nature miracles," healings, and exorcisms. Few; all "nature miracles". Jesus references to himself.

Focus of the gospel, including the many "I am" sayings. Basis of personal salvation. Good works, helping the poor, sick, imprisoned, and needy. Belief in Jesus as the Son of God. Duration of ministry. Location of ministry. Mainly Galilee. Mainly Judea, near Jerusalem. Aggravated assault committed in the Temple courtyard :. Near the end of his ministry. Near the start of his ministry. Date of the Last Supper. Passover eve.

Night before Passover eve. Ceremonial event at the Last Supper:. Communal meal. Foot washing. Who carried the cross? Visitors to the tomb on Sunday with Mary Magdalene? One or more additional women. None; Mary Magdalene went alone. Who was present in the tomb? One angel or two men. Two angels. Burial shroud. A single piece of cloth. Multiple pieces of cloth, as was the Jewish practice at the time. John Jesus' first appearance to disciples after his resurrection.

At Emmaus or Galilee. Liberal theologians generally accept the books of the Bible as historical documents, written by authors who were each motivated by a desire to promote their group's evolving spiritual and theological beliefs. Funk and others in the Jesus Seminar comment:. They did find one sentence in John that they felt was similar to something that actually Jesus said. They did find two short passages that they felt was not said by Jesus but which contained ideas close to his own:.

John where Jesus discusses the kernel of wheat that dies to produce a great harvest. Conservative theologians generally accept the Bible as inerrant in its original, autograph, form. For example, considering five of the apparent discrepancies listed in the above table:. Jesus' aggravated assault on people in the temple may have happened at any point in his ministry. It emphasizes Jesus' deity,. It is the basis of many of the historical, fundamental Christian beliefs, and. It bases an individual's salvation on faith rather than works.

Page Translator: This page translator works on Firefox, Opera, Chrome, and Safari browsers only After translating, click on the "show original" button at the top of this page to restore page to English.

About this site. About us. Our beliefs. Is this your first visit?